HOLLAND COLLEGE • November 5, 2002

INSIDE
COURT
 
 
 

 

College

Island

Editorial

News

Court

 

FRONT PAGE

   

Beating children with rod not considered to be for corrective purposes
By Tara Hencher
After more than two weeks of trial, a former Roman Catholic nun was found guilty of five charges of assaulting children who lived with her on a religious commune in Fredericton, P.E.I.
Lucille Poulin says she hit the children with a wooden rod for corrective purposes and the Bible gave her permission to do it.
“Spare the rod, spoil the child,” she quoted from the Bible when they testified.
During the trial, the five children testified they were beaten for things like taking a cookie or laughing at the kitchen table. They said they weren’t always told what they had done wrong. Sometimes Poulin would just start hitting them.
“She just got angry and took her anger out on kids and she enjoyed it,” said one of the young boys, whose name can’t be revealed because of a publication ban.
“She was smiling,” he added.
Another boy testifed Poulin would chase the children through the house, hitting them on different parts of their bodies.
“Her face would get all red, and she’d just go psycho with it,” he said.
During closing arguments, defence lawyer Zia Chishti argued there was no physical proof the children had been assaulted, and it was needed to prove the force used on the children was excessive.
But prosecutor Darrell Coombs said the charge of simple assault didn’t require proof of injury. If there had been proof, the charge would have been assault causing bodily harm.
Chishti’s other argument was that Poulin hit the children for corrective purposes.
“The object of the rod was for corrective purposes for the benefit of the children, to see them growing up with Christian beliefs, equipped with all the virtues of the belief,” he said.
Chishti also said Poulin’s group should be considered a religious minority and be given the protection to pursue its beliefs.
However, after hearing all the arguments, Justice David Jenkins said he didn’t believe Poulin had struck the children for only corrective purposes.
“The children were subjected to a harsh and stern environment devoid of most of the natural pleasures and experiences accessible to young children,” Jenkins said, reading from his written statement.
“A regime in which, by the very face of their presuméd nature they were bound to fail and then punished for their non-compliance.”
Jenkins said Poulin’s frequent use of a heavy wooden stick to punish the children and drive out the demons she claimed lived inside the children was excessive.
When the verdict was announced Poulin, who was dressed in the same home-made violet printed dress, matching bonnet and light purple canvas shoes, wrapped tightly in a white shawl, looked crest-fallen, as did her followers who sat behind her with the public.
When Poulin first arrived at the courthouse, she entered the building singing hymns with her supporters.
When she left, she wasn’t singing. She was surrounded by her followers and kept her head down as they made their way to a waiting blue van.
Chishti said Poulin took the verdict lightly.
“She’s saying simply that whatever is the will of God, she will bear it.”
Poulin, who testified in her own defence, is confident in her reasons for hitting the children with the rod.
“I know I will be with Jesus in glory,” she said. “I fear no judgment. I am justified by faith.”
Poulin’s sentencing will be handed down on Nov. 7 at 10 a.m.